A self-signed certificate is a digital certificate authenticated by the issuer’s own private key. Lacking endorsement from a recognized certificate authority (CA), these certificates are typically not trusted by default on many systems, which can result in warnings or errors on public websites.
But self-signed certificates are still quite common. They are now primarily used for internal purposes, such as testing, development environments, or private networks, where the need for third-party validation is minimal.
The use of self-signed certificates can present significant challenges for security teams. The primary issue lies in the often-limited oversight concerning the quantity, installation locations, ownership, and private key storage of these certificates. This lack of visibility heightens the risk of security breaches. Moreover, the process of addressing these vulnerabilities is further complicated by a crucial limitation: unlike certificates issued by publicly trusted Certificate Authorities (CAs), self-signed certificates lack the capability for revocation, adding an additional layer of complexity to their management.
Advantages of self-signed certificates
The most tangible benefits of self-signed certificates are saving money and reducing administrative efforts. Additionally, self-signed certificates are a valid alternative for securing internal communications or testing environments.
If properly secured, self-signed certificates can actually reduce the risk profile of using CA-issued certificates for internal communications. Here is a breakdown of common advantages of using self-signed certificates:
- Cost-Effective Solution: The creation and implementation of self-signed certificates incur no expenses, offering a budget-friendly alternative to certificates issued by Certificate Authorities (CAs).
- User-Friendly and Quick Deployment: The process of generating and implementing self-signed certificates is straightforward and swift, rendering them a practical choice for temporary setups or localized systems.
- Unlimited Certificate Creation: There is no cap on the number of self-signed certificates that developers and system administrators can produce. This autonomy eliminates the need for reliance on external teams for the creation of these certificates.
- Ideal for Internal Applications: Owing to the absence of validation by external Certificate Authorities, self-signed certificates are particularly well-suited for use in internal networks, private infrastructures, and testing environments. In these scenarios, the primary concern is encryption, with trust validation being a secondary consideration.
Risks and challenges with self-signed certificates
When compared with certificates signed by CAs, self-signed certificates are often viewed as less trustworthy because they contain both the public and private keys in the same entity. With signed certificates, a trusted Certificate Authority must verify the certificate applicant’s domain ownership and identity information, whereas anyone can generate a self-signed certificate without having to submit through this means of authentication.
Other common limitations and considerations for self-signed certificates include:
- Lacking Trust Validation: A primary limitation of self-signed certificates is their lack of external trust validation. Being unendorsed by a recognized Certificate Authority (CA), they often trigger warning alerts in web browsers and other client applications, signaling users to proceed with caution.
- Increased Security Risks: In the event of a compromise, self-signed certificates can become significant security liabilities. Attackers may exploit these certificates to impersonate the entities they represent, leading to potential security breaches.
- Necessity for Manual Trust Configuration: For self-signed certificates to be accepted, users must undertake the process of manually adding them to their trust stores. This demands a certain level of technical acumen, and can be particularly challenging for users without technical expertise, often being seen as inconvenient and complex.
- Lack of support and warranty: Certificate authorities that issue public certificates provide a range of services including support, specialized knowledge, and tools for managing their certificates. However, with self-signed certificates, which are created internally, such external support and resources are not available. Managing these certificates requires dedicated human and financial investments to maintain effective control and oversight.
What is the duration of validity for self-signed certificates?
Self-signed certificates, regardless of their type (TLS/SSL, S/MIME, document signing, or code signing), cannot be revoked and never expire. This key limitation of self-signed certificates is often mistaken for a benefit. It means compromised certificates are difficult to identify, which has several security challenges. CAs can revoke a certificate if they discover it has been compromised, but organizations must go through the process of replacing or rotating the certificate.
This “set it and forget it” mentality around certificates, along with the inability to rapidly revoke a compromised private key associated with a self-signed certificate, can open the door to malicious attackers.
Learn more about machine identity security, and how it can benefit your organization!
